Comparison of Number Head Together (NHT) Model and Discovery Learning Model Based Scientific Approach Towards VIII Grade Students’ Learning Outcomes in Biology Cognitive Competence in SMP it Darul Hasan Padangsidimpuan

Asma Edi Hasan, . Violita

Abstract


This study compared Number Head Together (NHT) and Discovery Learning learning models based scientific approach at the Darul Hasan Padangsidimpuan School of Integrated IT Middle School towards the learning outcomes of biology in grade VIII. This study used a quasi-experimental approach and the research design used was The Static Group Comparison Design. Sampling was done by purposive sampling technique, so that the selected class were class VIII-C (experimental group I) and class VIII-D (experimental group II). Instrument used was a written test in form of multiple choice test, while data ofstudents’ cognitive competence were analyzed using t-test.

Based on the final test results, it can be concluded that there are significant differences between Number Head Together (NHT) and Discovery Learning based scientific approach in students’ cognitive competence. Students’ cognitive competence using Number Head Together (NHT) model is higher than using Discovery Learning model.


Keywords


Number Head Together, Discovery Learning, Scientific

Full Text:

PDF

References


(1) Agus, A.R. 2013. Psikologi Sosial: Integrasi Pengetahuan Wahyu dan Pengetahuan Empirik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

(2) Agustin, S et al. 2013. The Effect Of Using Numbered Head Together Technique On The Eighth Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement At SMPN 2 Tanggul Jember. Journal of Education. Pancaran, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 201-210, August 2013.

(3) Ahmadi, A & Nur. 2007. Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

(4) Ali, M. 1983. Guru Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

(5) Arifin, M. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Kimia. Universitas Negeri Malang: IMSTEP.

(6) Arikunto, S. 2008. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

(7) Bruner, J.S. 1960. The Process of Education. Harvard University Press Cambridge.

(8) Djamarah, S & Aswan. 2006. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

(9) Etin, S & Raharjo. 2007. Pembelajaran kooperatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

(10) Habsari, S. 2005. Bimbingan & Konseling SMA Kelas XI. Jakarta: Grasindo.

(11) Hamalik, O. 2003. Pendekatan Baru Strategi Belajar Mengajar Berdasarkan CBSA. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

(12) Hosnan. 2014. Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

(13) Klahr, D. 2004. The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Journal aboutPsychological Science. Department of Psychology Carnegie Mellon University.

(14) Lie, A. 2002. Cooperative Learning. Jakarta: Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia.

(15) Lie, A. 2008. Pembelajaran kooperatif: Mempraktikkan Pembelajaran kooperatif diRuang-Ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Grasindo.

(16) Lince, R. 2016. Creative Thinking Ability to Increase Student Mathematical of Junior High School by Applying Models Numbered Heads Together. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol.7, No.6, 2016. www.iiste.org.

(17) Lufri. 2007. Kiat Memahami Metodologi dan Melakukan Penelitian. Padang: UNP Press.

(18) Maman, M & Andi A.R. 2016. The Implementation of Cooperative Learning Model ‘Number Heads Together (NHT)’ in Improving the Students’ Ability in Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). Vol.5, No.2, June 2016, pp. 174~180.

(19) Mayer, R. 2004. Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction. Journal American Psychologist. Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 14–19.

(20) Muhammad, U.U. 2000. Menjadi Guru Profesional.Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

(21) Mulyono, A.. 1999. Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

(22) Nurhadi. 2004. Kurikulum 2004 Pertanyaan dan Jawaban. Jakarta: Grasindo.

(23) Nursyamsi S.Y & Aloysius. 2016. “The Effect Of Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Learning Strategy On The Retention Of Senior High School Students In Muara Badak, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. European Journal of Education Studies. Vol 2.Issue 5.2016, www.oapub.org/edu.

(24) Rahmatwati, D, et al. 2014. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Head Together Berbasis Eksperimen Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMP. Unnes Physics Education Journal.UPEJ 3 (1) (2014), http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej.

(25) Roestiyah, N.K. 1998. Masalah Pengajaran Sebagai Suatu Sistem. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

(26) Setyosari, P. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

(27) Siadari. 2001. Model Pembelajaran Penemuan Konsep. Bandung: Remadja Karya.

(28) Silberman, M. 2006. Active Learning 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Bandung: Nusadiy dan Nuansa.

(29) Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

(30) Slavin. 2006. Educational Psychology Theory and Practice. United statesof America.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Asma Edi Hasan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.