A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods in Optimizing Water Loss Management Strategies used in Water Distribution System

Maselle Joseph Kadenge, Verdiana Grace Masanja, Mashaka Mkandawile

Abstract


This paper presents a comparative analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods integrated with numerical optimization technique to optimize water loss management strategies used in the water distribution system. The study was conducted at Moshi Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Authority (MUWSA), Tanzania. Two ranking methods, Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) integrated with Integer Linear Programming (ILP) technique were compared. The aim is to help decision-makers to choose the best decision-making method that may help to optimize the water loss management strategies used in water distribution systems. The Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods were used in evaluating and prioritizing the strategies while the Integer Linear Programming technique was used to formulate a decision model and selecting the best strategies (alternatives) employed in water loss management. Results show that the methods rank the given alternatives differently while when integrated with integer linear programming technique, the formulated models select the same portfolios of alternatives. Both models select thirteen alternatives, which cost 97% (TZS 235.71 million) of the total budgets set by the water authority for WLM. Furthermore, the models showed robustness to their results; when the ranking of evaluation criteria changes, the portfolios of alternatives remained the same. In general, this paper elaborates how decision-making methods can be coupled with mathematics in operation research to solve issues in water management and planning.


Keywords


Multi-Attribute Value Theory; Integer Linear Programming; Water Loss Management; SMARTER; COPRAS; SAW; MUWSA.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Makaya, E. (2016). Water loss management strategies for developing countries.

SELEK, B., ADIGÜZEL, A., İRİTAŞ, Ö., KARAASLAN, Y., KINACI, C., MUHAMMETOĞLU, A. and MUHAMMETOĞLU, H. (2018). Management of water losses in water supply and distribution networks in Turkey. Türkiye Su Bilimleri ve Yönetimi Dergisi. 2(1): 58-75.

Ndunguru, M. G. and Hoko, Z. (2016). Assessment of water loss in Harare, Zimbabwe. Journal of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene for Development. 6(4): 519-533.

Charalambous, B., Foufeas, D. and Petroulias, N. (2014). Leak detection and water loss management. Water Utility Journal. 8(25-30.

Zardari, N. H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S. M. and Yusop, Z. B. (2015). Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision-making model outcomes in water resources management: Springer.

Fontana, M. and Morais, D. (2016). Decision model to control water losses in distribution networks. Production, 26 (4), 688-697.

Mutikanga, H. E., Sharma, S. K. and Vairavamoorthy, K. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis: a strategic planning tool for water loss management. Water Resources Management. 25(14): 3947.

Adali, E. A. and Işık, A. T. (2016). Air conditioner selection problem with COPRAS and ARAS methods. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 5(2): 124-138.

Podvezko, V. (2011). Comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inžinerinė ekonomika. 134-146.

Velasquez, M. and Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Operations Research. 10(2): 56-66.

Banihabib, M. E., Hashemi-Madani, F.-S. and Forghani, A. (2017). Comparison of Compensatory and non-compensatory Multi-Criteria Decision Making Models in Water Resources Strategic Management. Water Resources Management. 31(12): 3745-3759.

Cambrainha, G. M. and Fontana, M. E. (2018). A multi-criteria decision-making approach to balance water supply-demand strategies in water supply systems. Production. 28(

Yilmaz, B. and Harmancioglu, N. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making for water resource management: a case study of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey. Water SA. 36(5):

Volvačiovas, R., Turskis, Z., Aviža, D. and Mikštienė, R. (2013). Multi-attribute selection of public buildings retrofits strategy. Procedia Engineering. 57(1236-1241.

Stanujkić, D., Đorđević, B. and Đorđević, M. (2013). Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks. Serbian journal of management. 8(2): 213-241.

Sureeyatanapas, P. (2016). Comparison of rank-based weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making. Engineering and Applied Science Research. 43(376-379.

Roberts, R. and Goodwin, P. (2002). Weight approximations in multi‐attribute decision models. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis. 11(6): 291-303.

Roszkowska, E. (2013). Rank ordering criteria weighting methods–a comparative overview.

Mondal, S., Kuila, S., Singh, A. K. and Chatterjee, P. (2017). A complex proportional assessment method-based framework for industrial robot selection problem. Int J Res Sci Eng. 3(368-378.

Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for MCDM Methods Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study (pp. 131-175): Springer.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Maselle Joseph Kadenge

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.