Runoff Prediction in an Ungauged Catchment of Upper Deduru Oya Basin, Sri Lanka: A Comparison of HEC-HMS and WEAP Models

Modsarajah Rajendran, E.R.N. Gunawardena, N.D.K. Dayawansa

Abstract


Runoff prediction from ungauged catchment has always been a challenging task, requires transfer of hydrologic information from gauged to ungauged catchments. However, it is not clear whether information transfer among nearby catchments is suitable across a wide range of climatic and geographic regions. In this study, stream flow data of a gauged catchment (Tittawella tank) were used for calibration and validation of HEC-HMS (Hydrological model) and WEAP (Water resource model). Watershed area ratio technique was adopted to simulate runoff from an ungauged catchment (Hakwatuna Oya) and the results were compared. The simulated flows generated by both models in calibration and validation showed good agreement with observed flows. Monthly flows simulated by both models were quite similar. Although HEC-HMS enables runoff simulation on daily basis with better prediction of peaks, necessary for flood forecasting, monthly simulation is adequate for water managers to take management decisions. Therefore, WEAP as a single model can be used for both runoff simulation and taking management decisions in Hakwatuna Oya catchment.


Keywords


HEC-HMS, hydrological modelling, ungauged catchment, WEAP.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ostojski, M.S., Niedbałam J., Orlińska, P., Wilk, P., Wróbel, J. and Kidd, R., Water Availability in Reference to Water Needs in Poland. The Importance of Correct Estimation of Water Resources. Earthzing, 2012. http://earthzine.org/2012/01/09/water-availability-in-reference-to-water-needs-in-poland-the-importance-of-correct-estimation-of water resources/. Date accessed: 08/05/2018.

Orlińska-Woźniak, P., Paweł Wilk, P. and Gębala, J. (2013). Water availability in reference to water needs in Poland. Meteorology Hydrology and Water Management, 2013, 1, 46-50.

Boko, M., Niang, I., Nyong, A., Vogel, C., Githeko, A., Medany, M., Osman-Elasha, B., Tabo, R. and Yanda, P., Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Chapter 9: Africa. Contribution to Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, 2007, pp.433-467.

Kundzewicz, Z.W., Mata, L.J., Arnell, N.W., D¨oll, P., Kabat, P., Jim´enez, B., Miller, K.A., Oke T., Sen, Z. and Shiklomanov, I.A., Freshwater resources and their management, in: Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, Contribution of working group ii tot the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change,2007, pp.173–210.

Yang, D., Shi, X. and Marsh, P., Variability and extreme of Mackenzie River daily discharge during 1973–2011. Quaternary International, 2015, 380–381: 159–168.

Li, H., Zhang, Y. and Zhou, X. (2015). Predicting Surface Runoff from Catchment to Large Region. Advances in Meteorology, 2015, pp. 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/720967.

Surur, A., Simulated Impact of Land use dynamics on hydrology during a 20- 65 year period of Beles Basin in Ethiopia. M.Sc Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Sweden, 2010.

Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S.W., Gupta, V.K., Karambiri, H., Lakshmi, V., Liang, X., Mcdonnell, J.J., Mendi Ondo, E.M., O'connell, P.E., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J.W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S. and Zehe, E., IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins, PUB. 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2003, 48, 857–880.

Chu, X.F. and Steinman, A., Event and continuous hydrologic modeling with HEC-HMS. Journal of Irrigation Drainage Engineering, 2009, 135,119–124.

Choudhari, K., Panigrahi, B. and Paul, J.C. (2014). Simulation of rainfall-runoff process using HEC-HMS model for Balijore Nala watershed, Odisha, India. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2014, 5, 253-265.

SEI (Stockholm Environment Institute), WEAP: Water evaluation and planning system – user guide. Boston, USA, 2001.

Yates, D., Sieber, J., Purkey, D. and Huber-Lee, A. (2005). "WEAP21 – A Demand-, Priority-, and Preference-Driven Water Planning Model/Part 1: Model Characteristics." International Water Resources Association - Water International, 2005, 30, 487–500.

Mounir, Z.M., Ma, C.M. and Amadou, I., Application of Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP): A Model to Assess Future Water Demands in the Niger River (In Niger Republic). Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, 2011, 5, 38-49.

Alfarra, A., Kemp-Benedict, E., Hötz, H., Sader, N. and Sonneveld, B., Modeling Water Supply and Demand for Effective Water Management Allocation in the Jordan Valley. Journal of Agricultural Science and Applications (JASA), 2012, 1, 1-7.

Lu, H. and Jing-ai, W., Evaluate to Water Resources Vulnerability Using SWAT-WEAP Model in Tributary of Xiliaohe River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27, 468-479.

Hao, Lu, Ge Sun, Yongqiang Liu, and Hong Qian., Integrated Modeling of Water Supply and Demand under Management Options and Climate Change Scenarios in Chifeng City, China. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2015, 51, 655-671.

Irrigation department, Hydrology of small catchments, Volume II, Hydrology division, Sri Lanka,1998.

Oudin, L., Andre´assian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C. and Le Moine, N., Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments, Water Resources Research, 2008, 44, W03413, doi:10.1029/2007WR006240.

Sivapalan, M., Prediction in ungauged basins: a grand challenge for theoretical hydrology, Hydrological Processes, 2003, 17, 3163-3170.

Gianfagnaa, C.C., Johnsona, C.E., Chandler, D.G. and Hofmann, C., Watershed area ratio accurately predicts daily streamflow in nested catchments in the Catskills, New York. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2015, 4, 583–594.

Archfield, S.A. and Vogel, R.M., Mapcorrelationmethod: selection of a reference streamgage to estimate daily streamflow at ungaged catchments. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46, W10513.

SMEC., Hydrological Study of The Tana-Beles Sub-Basins (part 1). Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation: Australia, 2007, pp.77.

Wale, A., Rientjes, T.H.M., Gieske, A.S.M. and Getachew, H.A., Ungauged catchment contributions to Lake Tana’s water balance. Hydrological Process, 2009, 23: 3682–3693.

HEC. Hydrological Modelling System (HEC-HMS) user`s Manual, Version 3.5. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrological Engineering Center, 2010.

Feldman, A.D., Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS. Technical Reference Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Hydrologic Engineering Center, HEC. Davis, CA, USA, 2000.

Lévite, H., Sally, H. and Cour, J., Testing water demand management scenarios in a water-stressed basin in South Africa: application of the WEAP model. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2003, 28, 779–786.

Jabloun, Mohamed and Sahli, Ali., WEAP-MABIA Tutorial, A collection of stand-alone chapters to aid in learning the WEAP-MABIA module, 2012.

Esteve, P., Varela-Ortega, Blanco-Gutiérrez, I. and Downing, T.E., A hydro-economic model for the assessment of climate change impacts and adaptation in irrigated agriculture. Ecological Economics, 2015, 120, 49–58.

Willmot, C.J., On the evaluation of model performance in physical geography, in: Spatial Statistics and Models, edited by: Gaile, G. L. and Willmot, C. J., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp.443-460.

Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S. and Yapo, P.O., Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1999,4,135-143.

Wijesekera, N.T.S., Karunaratna, K.N.C. and Nishantha, K.G.K.R., A Comparison of Storage Enhancement Practices—Case Study of Two Reservoirs in Kurunegala District of Sri Lanka, Journal of the institute of engineers Sri Lanka, 2001, 34, 52 - 57.

Krause, P., Boyle, D.P. and Base, F., Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances in Geosciences, European Geosciences Union, 2005, 5, 89-97.

Zhang, G.P. and Savenije, H.G. (2005). Rainfall-runoff modelling in a catchment with a complex groundwater flow system: application of the Representative Elementary Watershed (REW) approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2005, 9, 243–261.

Golmohammadi, G., Prasher, S., Madani, A. and Rudra, R., Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Hydrology, 2014, 1, 20-39.

Moriasi, D.N., Arnold, J.G., Van Liew, M.W., Binger, R.L., Harmel, R.D. and Veith, T., Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2007, 50, 885-900.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Modsarajah Rajendran, E.R.N. Gunawardena, N.D.K. Dayawansa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.