Validity of Learning Module Natural Sciences Oriented Constructivism With The Contain Of Character Education For Students of Class VIII AT Yunior Hight School

Karlini Oktarina, Lufri ., Moralita Chatri, Ramadhan Sumarmin

Abstract


Referring to primary data collected through observation and interview to natural science teachers and some students,  it is found that there is no natural science teaching materials in the form of learning modules that can make learners learn independently, build their own knowledge, and construct  good character in themselves. In order to address this problem,  then it is developed natural science  learning module oriented to constructivism with the contain of character education. The purpose of this study is to reconstruct valid module of natural science learning materials. This type of research is a development research using the Plomp model. The development phase of the Plomp model consists of 3 stages, namely 1) preliminary research phase, 2) development or prototyping phase, and 3) assessment phase. The result of the study shows that natural science  learning module oriented to constructivism with the contain of character education for students class VIII of  Yunior High School is strongly valid. In future work, practicality and effectiveness will be investigated.

Keywords


Development; Learning module of natural science; Constructivism approach; Character education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar–dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Ed. 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Abimanyu, Soli. dkk. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Agboola, Alex, and Kaun Chen Tsai. (2012). “Bring Character Education into Classroom.” 3(2): 163–170.

Alsulami, Sumayyah. (2016). “Toward a Constructivist Approach in Saudi Education.” English Language Teaching 9(12): 104–8.

Ayaz, Mehmet Fatih. (2015). “The Effects of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Student ’ S Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 14(4): 143–56.

Baştürk, Savaş. (2016). “Primary Pre-Service Teachers’ Perspectives on Constructivism and Its Implementation in Schools.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(4): 904–12.

Chitanana, lockias. (2012). “A Constructivist Approach to the Design and Delivery of an Online Professional Development Course: A Case of the Iearn Online Course”. Research Journal of Educational Sciences. 5 (1): 23-48

Darcia Narvaez and Daniel K. Lapsley. (2006). “Teaching Moral Character: Two Strategies for Teacher Education”. Center for Ethical Education. University of Notre Dame.

Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Complex Constructivism: A Theoretical Model of Complexity and Cognition. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 485–498.

Festiyet. (2008). Pembelajaran Fisika Berbantuan Program Komputer Interaktif untuk Meningkatkan Perhatian Belajar Siswa (Studi Eksperimen di SMPN 7 Padang. Disertasi. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.

Fitri, Rima Hersya. (2013). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Biologi Bernuansa Pendekatan Konstruktivisme pada Materi Sistem Gerak untuk Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 12 Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Bung Hatta

Hamdani. (2011). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Inan, Cemil. (2013). “Influence of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Students’ Levels of Learning Trigonometry and on Their Attitudes Towards Mathematics.” Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Hacettepe University Journal of Education 28(3): 219–34.

Lufri. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran Biologi Teori, Praktik dan Penelitian. Padang: Jurusan Biologi FMIPA Universitas Negeri Padang.

Mbati, Lydia. (2013). “Online Social Media Applications for Constructivism and Observational Learning.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14(5): 543–44.

Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Nasution. (2010). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta Bumi Aksara.

Muslich, M. (2010). Pendidikan Karakter Menjawab Tantangan Krisis Multidimensional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nasution. (2010). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Neo, Mai, Tse-kian Neo, and Gillian Tan Xiao-lian. (2007). “A Constructivist Approach to Learning an Interactive Multimedia Course : Malaysian Students â€TM Perspectives Introduction : The Constructivist Approach.” Australiasian Journal of Educational Technology 23(4): 470–89.

Nurhadi. (2003). Pendekatan Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Plomp, Tjeerd dan Nieveen, Nienke. (2010). An Introduction to Educational Desain Research. Netherlands: SLO

_________. (2013). Educational Design Research. Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).

Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovasi: Menciptakan Metode Pembelajaran yang Menarik dan Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Purwanto dkk. (2014). Pengembangan Modul. Jakarta: Pendidikan PUSTEKKOM Depdiknas.

Rovai, Alfred P. (2004). “A Constructivist Approach to Online College Learning.” Internet and Higher Education 7(2): 79–93.

Rustaman, N. (2002). Perencanaan dan Penilaian Praktikum Diperguruan Tinggi. (online),(http://fileupi.edu/Direktori/SPS/Prodi.Pendidikan_IPA/196 2011 51987031-pdf.

Salleh, Tuan Salwani Awang, and Effandi Zakaria. (2012). “Module for Learning Integral Calculus with Maple: Lecturers’ Views.” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 11(3): 234–45.

Schneider Daniel, Paraskevi Synteta, Catherine Frete. (2002). “Community, Content and Collaboration Management Systems in Education: A New Chance for Socio-constructivist Scenarios?”. Research on learning. 1 (1): 175-184

Setyaningrum, Yanur and Husamah. (2014). Optimalisasi Penerapan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Menengah berbasis Keterampilan Proses: Sebuah Perspektif Guru IPA-Biologi. (Jurnal). 1(1): Malang: UMM.

Sudjana, N dan Rivai, A. (2003). Teknologi Pengajaran. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono. (2007). Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara.

_______. (2008). Metode Penelitian PendekatanKuantitatif, Kualitatif dan dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumarmin, Ramadhan, dkk. (2014). “Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Biologi dengan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) yang Dilengkapi Peta Konsep untuk SMA Kelas XI” Jurnal Kolaboratif Vol.2 No.1.

Sumiati and Asra. (2007). Metode Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Wacana Prima.

Suparno, Paul. (2006). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Tan, Charlene. (2017). “Constructivism Sand Pedagogical Reform in China: Issues and Challenges.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 15(2): 238–47.

Tessmer, Martin. (2005). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations: Improving the Quality of Education and Training. London: Routledge.

Trianto. (2010). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Progresif. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Turan, Fethi, and Ilkay Ulutas. (2016). “Using Storybooks as a Character Education Tools.” 7(15): 169–76.Widodo, A. Nurhayati, L. 2005. Tahapan Pembelajaran yang konstruktivis: Bagaimanakah Pembelajaran di Sekolah?. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, Bandung 10 September.

Yulastri Asmar, Hidayat Hendra, G., & Islami Syaiful, E. F. (2017). Developing an Entrepreneurship Module by Using Product-Based Learning Approach in Vocational Education a Asmar, 12(5), 1097–1109.

Yunita, Ike Evi dan Hakim, Lukman. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Pembelajaran Kontekstual Bermuatan Karakter Pada Materi Jurnal Khusus. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Surabaya.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Karlini Oktarina, Lufri ., Moralita Chatri, Ramadhan Sumarmin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.