Work Sheet Oriented Multiple Intelligences Validity on Biology Topics for Student Class XI

Annisa Eka Mediza, Ramadhan Sumarmin, Dwi Putri Hilda


During the learning process, teachers are already using the Student Worksheet. Student worksheet used by teachers have some drawbacks such as the picture presented is not clear and has a color that is not attractive. In addition, the learning process still involves an explanation of the teacher, so that the student worksheets that have been designed not applicable because of time constraints. In the end, students are not able to develop intelligence that is in that will affect student learning outcomes.To address this problem, thedeveloped studentsWorksheet Oriented Multiple Intelligences. The purpose of this research is to develop students' worksheets Oriented Multiple Intelligences and to determine the validity criteria.  This type of research is the development of by using Plomp models. Plomp development model consists of three stages of development, namely: the initial investigation phase, the phase of the development and prototyping phase and the assessment phase. Data collection instruments used were the instruments validity of students' worksheets. Oriented student worksheets Multiple Intelligences validated by 3 experts and 1 teacher. The results showed that the aspect of content, presentation and language obtained a score of 86.67%, 84.37% and 82.14% to the category of very valid, while the graphic aspect obtained a score of 78.57% with a valid category. It can be concluded that student worksheets oriented Multiple Intelligences obtain very valid category. So it can use during the learning process and it expected to improve student learning outcomes.


Student Worksheet, Multiple Intelligences, Validity.

Full Text:



Armstrong, T. 2009. Multiple Inteligences in the Classroom (Third Ed.). Alexandrias: ASCD.

Arikunto. S. 2007. Evaluation Basics Pendidikan. Jakarta: Earth Literacy.

Asrizal, Festiyed, and Sumarmin, R. 2014. Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Bermuatan Literasi Sains Era Digital untuk Pembelajaran Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan. Vol. 1, No. 1. Pages 1-8

MONE. 2008. Teaching Material DevelopmentGuide.Jakarta: Directorate of SMA.

Ege, B., Supiandi, MI and Ridho, AAS 2016Relationship Between Multiple Intelligences Cognitive Students With Learning Outcomes Lesson In Natural Sciences. Pros. Semnas Pend. Postgraduate ipa UM. Vol. 1.

Gadner, H. 2011. Frames of Mind: The Theory of MultipleIntelligences.New York: Basic Book. Introduction to second paper edition (tenth-anniversary edition).

Goronga, P., Dozva. M., Gatsi., R and Gasva, M. 2014. Infusing Multiple Intelligences (MI) Theory into Teaching: Opportunities for Meaningful Learning. The International Asian Research Journal 02 (03): pp.10-16, 2014. ISSN: 2310-337X.

Hamzah, A. 2009. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences Learning Management And Its Implication. Tadris. Volume 252 4. No. 2.

Kezar, A. (2001). Theory Of Multiple Intelligences: Implications For Higherm Education. Innovative HigherEducation,26 (2), pp. 141-154. doi: 10.1023 / A: 1012292522528.

Kimberlin, CL and Almut G. Winterstein, AG 2008. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Health-Syst Pharm-Vol 65 Dec.1.

Leonardo, RR 2015. Multiple Intelligences Teaching And Assessment: ITS Influences On Filipino College Students' Mathematics Performance And Learning Experiences. International Journal of Educational Science and Research (IJESR.) Vol. 5, pp. 31-36.

McFaarlane, DA 2011. Multiple Intelligences: The Most Effective Platform for Global 21st Century Educational and Instructional Methodologies. CollegeQuarterly.Volume 14, Number 2.

Messick, S. (1989). Validity.In RL Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., Pp. 13-103). New "York: Macmillan.

Plomp, T and Nieveen, N.,2013.Educational DesignResearch.Netherlands: SLO.

Prastowo, A. (2011). Free Creative Creating Innovative Instructional Materials: Creating New Ways of Learning Interest andFun.Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

daughter, D and Mitarlis. 2015. Development of Student WorksheetBased Mind Mapping on the reaction rate material for creative thinking skills melatihkan Student Class XI High School. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education ISSN: 2252-9454 Vol. 4, No. 2, pp . 340-348.

Riduwan. 2009. Learning Easy-Employee Research for Teachers And Researchersstarters.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Subiyanto, I. 1993. Training Series "ResearchMethods,University Gunadarma.

Sudjana, Nana. 2004. Fundamentals of Learningteaching.Bandung: New Light Algensido Offset.

Trianto. 2011. designing the Innovative Learning ModelProgressive,Edition 4, Jakarta: Kencana.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Annisa Eka Mediza, Ramadhan Sumarmin, Dwi Putri Hilda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.