Comparison of Cooperative Learning Model Jigsaw and Think Pair Share (TPS) Toward Competency Learning High School Biology Class X To Content Ecosystem and Environmental Pollution

Muhamad Imron, Hardeli ., Dwi Hilda Puteri, Ramadhan Sumarmin


The results of observations that have been made in class X Senior high school Kurnia Jaya pangkalan nyirih shows that the discussion group in applied learning process of teachers has not gone well so the responsibility for students in discussions uneven and cognitive competence of learners is still low. One effort to overcome these problems is to use cooperative learning model, the model of learning jigsaw and Think Pair Share (TPS). This study aims to determine the ratio between the model jigsaw and Think Pair Share (TPS) on the competency study biology.

This study is a quasi-experimental research (quasi exsperiment). The study population was class X Senior high school Kurnia Jaya pangkalan nyirih  Academic Year 2016/2017, sampling was done by using purposive sampling and got class X1, as an experimental class I treatedmodels, jigsaw and class X3  as an experimental class II treated TPS models. Instruments used in the form of an essay test. Data analysis techniques to test the hypotheses is t-test.

results showed competence comparison study results are significant (sig <0.05) among students who study with the model jigsaw and students learn tomodels. think pair share It can be concluded that there is no difference to the competence of student learning outcomes. The difference is only found in classical completeness between classes using a model jigsaw with a class that uses a model polling stations. The average value of competence cognitive abilities experimental class I is 81.60 with the percentage of students who completed was 85.18% and the percentage of students who have not completed was 14.81%. While the experimental class II average cognitive ability competence is 81.09 with the percentage of students who completed was 69.23% and the percentage of students who have not completed was 30.77%. Affective and psychomotor value in both the experimental class is in the value of both categories.


Cooperatif; Jigsaw; Think Pair Share; Competency.

Full Text:



Bataineh, MZ 2015. Think Pair Share, Co-Op Co Op and Traditional Learning Strategies on Undergraduate Academic Performance. Journal of Educational and Social Research, ISSN 2239-978X, Vol 5 No 1

Cagatay, G., & Demirciaglu, G. 2013. The Effect of Jigsaw-1 Cooperative Learning Technique on Students' Understanding about the Basic Organic Chemistry Concepts. The International Journal of Educational Researches, ISSN: 1308-9501

Hollander, JA 2012. Learning to Discus: Strategies for Improving the Quality of Class Discussion. TeachingSociology.(online), vol. 30, 2002, accessed 05 November 2014).

Ibrahim, M. 2002. CooperativeLearning.Surabaya: Unesa.

Kemendikbud. 2014. Training materials 2013 2014 curriculum implementation Jakarta: Kemendikbud

Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. 2012. Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: A Practical Guide.

Lie. 2002. Cooperative learning (cooperative memperaktikkan diruang class). Grassindo: Jakarta.

Lufri, Arlis, Yunus, Y., & Sudirman. 2007. Biology LearningStrategies.Padang: Department of Biological Science UNP.

Mulyasa, E. 2007. Education Unit LevelCurriculum.Bandung: PT Young Rosdakarya.

Muraya, DN, & Kimamo, G. 2011. Effects of Cooperative Learning aproach Achhievement Mean Scores on Biology of Secondary School Students' in Machakos District, Kenya. Academic Journal, ISSN 1990-3839

Purwanto, M., & Ngalim. 2012. Principles of TeachingEvaluation.Jakarta: PT. Youth Rosdakarya.

Ramadhan, S. 2017. The Implementation Of Cooperatif Learning Type Numbered Heads Together To Improved Students Learning Competence Of Biology Class X MIA 2 SMA Negeri Solok Selatan, Bioeducation journal vol. 1 no. 2, ISNN:2354-8363

Rusman. 2011. Models of Learning. Jakarta: PT Raja Gravindo Persada.

Sanjaya, W. 2008. LearningStrategy.Kencana Prenada Media Group: Jakarta.

Sagala. 2009. The concept and meaning oflearning.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sardiman. 2008. Interaction of Teaching and Learning and Motivation. Jakarta: PT. King Grafindo Persada

Slameto. 2010. Learning and Factors Affecting. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Copyright

Slavin, R. 2009. CooperativeLearning.Nusa Media: Bandung.

Sudjana, N. 2010. The Basics of Teaching andLearning.New Light Algensindo: Bandung.

Suryono & Haryanto. 2011. Teaching and Learning. Bandung: PT Young Rosdakarya.

Sutikno. 2009. Teaching and Learning. Prospect: Bandung.

Trianto. 2014 Innovative Design-Progressive Learning Model and Contextual. Kencana Prena Media Group: Jakarta.

Slameto. 2010. Learning and Factors Affecting. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Copyright

Supaman, Wondal, R., & Djamrud, S. 2014. Application ofCooperative Learning Model Jigsaw to Improve Learning Activities and Results of the IPA on Environmental Pollution Concept. Bioedukasi journal, ISSN: 2301-4678, Vol 3, No 1

Syamsurizal. 2006. Assessment ofLearning.Padang: Department of Biological Science UNP.

Yamin, M. 2012. Learning Strategy CompetenceBerbsais.Jakarta: Reference (GP Press Group).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Muhamad Imron, Hardeli ., Dwi Hilda Puteri, Ramadhan Sumarmin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.