Analysis Differences in the Performance of Regional Government non-WTP Opinion Period And WTP Opinion Period (Study in Regencies / Cities in Sumatra Island 2015-2016).

Syafrul Antoni, Yurniwati ., Suhairi .


This study aims to examine the comparison of the performance of the district / city regional government with the Unqualified Opinion (WTP) and non-WTP opinions on the island of Sumatra in 2015-2016. This study uses purposive sampling on districts / cities that experienced an increase in opinion from non-WTP in 2015 to WTP in 2016 . The sample of this research is 33 local government with observation for 2 years. Hypothesis testing in this research using independent test t-test. This topic was chosen because the problem of the Regional Government in obtaining WTP opinions should be in line with efforts to achieve good performance in financial management. Ideally, efforts to achieve WTP opinion are also accompanied by efforts to achieve the best performance, there is no corruption, and the people are increasingly prosperous in accordance with the 1945 Constitution article 23 paragraph 1. The results of this study proves that there are differences in local government performance in Indicators of Human Development Index between local governments of cities / districts that obtain non-WTP and WTP opinion. And there is no difference in financial performance in the Regional Government Operator Performance Evaluation Indicators and Gross Regional Domestic Product between the city / district regional governments that obtain Non-WTP and WTP opinions.


Local Government Operator Performance Evaluation; Human Development Index ; Gross Regional Domestic Product

Full Text:



Azhar, M. (2008). Analysis of the financial performance of district / municipal governments before and after regional autonomy. (Thesis. University of North Sumatra)

Anifa Yasmin, 2016. "Comparison of the performance of regency/ municipal governments that get wtp and non wtp opinions" Essay. Universitas Lampng

Adisasmita, Rahardjo, 2011. Regional Revenue Management and Budget, Graha Science, Yogyakarta.

Bruijn, Hans De. 2002. Performance Measurement in ThePubl ic Sector: Strategies to Cope With The Risk of Performance Measurement. Emerald Insight.

BabanSobandi, et al. 2006. Decentralization and Demands for Regional Institutional Arrangement. Contents: Humanities Members IKAPI

Dora Detisa. (2008). "Relationship between Regional Asset Management and the Quality of Financial Reports at the Sorong District Government" Essay. Samarinda: Mulawarman University

Chan Yee Ching Lilian. 2004. Performance measurement and adoptionof balanced scorecards. Emerald Insight, Vol: 17: 188-202.

Chow, CW, Ganulin, D., Haddad, K. and Williamson, J. 1 998. The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing health- careorganization management. Journal of Health- care Management.

Greiling, Dorothea. 2005. Performance measurement i n the public sector: the German experience.Emerald Research, Vol. 54: 551-567.

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasianalisis multivariat dengan program IBM SPSS19.Cet, ke lima.Semarang: DiponegoroUniversity Publishing


Halachmi, Arie. 2005. Performance measureme nt is only one way of managing performance.Internat ional Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. Vol. 54: 502- 516.

Halim, Abdul. 2001. Definisi Keuangan Daerah : ”Ak untansi Keuangan Daerah, Edisi 3”. Jakarta Salemba Four.

Halim, Abdul, 2012. Teori, Konsep, dan AplikasiAk untansi Sektor Publik, Salemba Empat, Jakarta

Nolan, James F, Moore, Adrian, dan Segal, Geoffrey. 2003. Putting out the trash:measuring municipal service efficiency in US cities. Working Paper Series. SSRN September Padovani.

Mardiasmo. 2002. Autonomy and Regional Financial Management. Yogyakarta: Publisher Andi.

Mardiyanto, Handono. 2008. Inti Sari FinancialManagement.Jakarta: Grasindo.

Mahsun, M. 2006. Measurement of Public Sector Performance. Yogyakarta: BPFE- UGM.

Mahmudi. 2010. Public Sector Accounting. UII Press publisher. Yogyakarta.Government Regulation Number 58 Year 2005 concerning

Regional Financial Management. Government Regulation No.60 of 2008 concerning the Government's Internal Control System.

Government Regulation Number 58 Year 200 5 concerning Regional Financial Management.Government Regulation Number 71 of 2010 concerning Government Accounting Standards.

Republic of Indonesia. 2014. Undang- Undang No. 23 Tahun 2014.

Republic of Indonesia. Undang-Undan No.33 Tahun2004.Tentang PerimbanganKeuangan Antara Pemer intahPusatdanPemerintah Daerah. Jakarta: DepartemenKeuangan Republik Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. Undang- Undang No.33 Tahun2004 . Regarding Financial Balance between the Central Government and Regional Governments. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.

RifkaAmalia and Rohman, Abdul (2012) Analysis of Central Government Financial Performance in 2005 to 2010.Undergraduate thesis, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis. http://eprints. /35545/

Rusdy,2010."Analysis of Determinants of Regional Government Financial Performance and Determination of Fiscal Illusions (Case Study of Provinces in indonesia in 2005-2008)". Thesis, Faculty of Economics, Diponogoro University.

RosmiatyTarmizi, Khairudin, Ayu Jayadi, 2014. "Analysts are the Regional Government Financial Performance of the City of Lampung Band Before and After Obtaining WTP Opinion" Journal of Agriculture & Financial Accounts Vol. 5, No. 2, September 2014 Pages 71-90

RoekiHakiki, 2017. "Comparative analysis of district / city government financial performance with unqualified opinions (wtp) and non Wtp based on value for money in the province Lampung tahun 2011- 2015” Skripsi. Faculty Ekonomi da Bisnis, Universitas Lampung.

SolehChabib and RohcmansjahHeru, 2010. Regional Financial and Asset Management Bandung: Fokusmedia.

Sugiyono. 2007. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods. Alfabeta publisher. Jakarta.

Sugiyono. 2012. Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods. Alfabeta publisher. Jakarta.Wood, L. 1998. Local Government Dollars & Sense (Ranc ho Palos Verdes, CA.: Training Shoppe).

Yang, Kaifeng dan Hsieh, Jun Yi. 2007. Manageri al Effectiveness of Government Per formanceMeas urement: Testing a Middle-Rang e Model. Public Administration Review October 2007.

YuniWulanDary, M.RizalYahya, 2016. "Analysis of Differences in Financial Performance of Original Income in the NON OpinionPeriod on WTtp and the Period of Wtp Opinion" Scientific Journal of Economic Economics Students (JIMEKA) Vol. 1, No. 1, (2016) Pages 60-73



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Syafrul Antoni, Yurniwati ., Suhairi .

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.